Friday, October 3, 2025

Why Systems Engineering in Chute Design?

 Systems Chute Design

  • Mining chutes (e.g. ROM bin discharge, conveyor transfers, load-out stations) are critical bottlenecks in coal handling.

  • Failures often occur not because of poor fabrication, but because of system-level oversights — dust control, maintainability, wear-life, flow interactions.

  • A systems engineering lens highlights the importance of considering the whole coal-handling chain, stakeholder requirements, and lifecycle impacts.

Hamilton By Design | Chute Design | Systems Engineering


Stakeholder Requirements and Context

  • Mine operators: Need reliability, minimal downtime, low maintenance costs.

  • Maintenance teams: Need safe access, modular liners, simple replacement.

  • Environmental stakeholders: Dust suppression, spillage control.

  • Design/fabricators: Need practical geometries and materials suited to coal flow.

  • Regulators/community: Noise, dust, and safety compliance.

Here you can apply the V-model or a requirements traceability matrix to show how system needs cascade into chute geometry, materials, and installation.



System Integration

  • Upstream/Downstream interactions: Coal size distribution, moisture content, conveyor speeds, and bunker pressures all affect chute performance.

  • Interface management: Chute design cannot be isolated — must integrate with feeders, crushers, screens, conveyors.

  • System-of-systems: The chute is a subsystem within the broader materials handling system; optimisation requires flow modelling (DEM, CFD).

Lifecycle Engineering

  • Design for maintainability: Bolt-in wear liners, modular chute sections.

  • Reliability-centred design: Anticipating failure modes (blockages, excessive wear, dust plumes).

  • Lifecycle cost analysis: Weighing upfront fabrication vs. long-term downtime costs.

  • Refurbishment strategies: How companies like HIC Services approach extending system life.

Modelling and Verification

  • Modelling tools: DEM (Discrete Element Method) for coal particle trajectories; CFD for dust and air entrainment.

  • Verification & validation: Linking lab-scale tests (TUNRA Bulk Solids) with real plant performance.

  • Iterative design: Prototyping in simulation before fabrication reduces system-level risk.

Case Studies (Hunter Valley Examples)

  • A new build chute by T.W. Woods (focus on heavy-duty fabrication and commissioning).

  • An optimisation study by Chute Technology (DEM-driven redesign to reduce blockages).

  • A maintenance rebuild by HIC Services (liner replacement strategy for lifecycle extension).

  • A research contribution by TUNRA Bulk Solids (fundamental bulk solids testing feeding into design).

Each illustrates different systems engineering principles: requirement analysis, integration, lifecycle thinking, verification.

  • Coal chute design is a microcosm of systems engineering: multiple stakeholders, competing objectives, and lifecycle considerations.

  • By framing it this way, engineers can avoid "patch-and-fix" thinking and deliver sustainable, reliable designs that serve the whole system.


Additional Reading

Systems engineering frameworks (for your methodology section)

Chute design fundamentals & best practice

Modelling, DEM/CFD, and case studies (coal-focused)

Hunter Valley context & collaborations (local examples you can cite)

Safety & compliance (useful for your requirements section)

Hamilton By Design

At Hamilton by Design, we believe engineering challenges—whether in coal chute optimisation, materials handling, or broader industrial systems—are best solved by applying systems thinking. By connecting user needs, lifecycle performance, and rigorous verification, we help transform complex projects into reliable, sustainable solutions.

If you’re facing challenges in your own operations—blockages, dust issues, or costly downtime—let’s start a conversation about how a systems engineering approach can deliver clarity and long-term value.

Get in touch with Hamilton by Design today to explore how we can support your next project with design, analysis, and lifecycle engineering expertise.

Coal Chute Design - Hamilton By Design


 

Mechanical Engineering | Structural Engineering

Mechanical Drafting | Structural Drafting

3D CAD Modelling | 3D Scanning

Chute Design

SolidWorks Contractors in Australia

Hamilton By Design – Blog


Thursday, October 2, 2025

Robotics and Human Relations: Risks, Ethics, and the Path Forward

 



Introduction

The rapid integration of robotics into industrial workplaces has transformed the way humans engage with machines. While robots promise efficiency, consistency, and relief from hazardous tasks, their deployment also exposes workers to new risks. Two recent incidents illustrate the dual-edged nature of this technological advancement: the alleged robotic arm attack in a Tesla facility, where a worker filed a lawsuit after suffering severe injuries, and the fatality in a Wisconsin pizza factory, where a worker was crushed by a robotic machine (People, 2025; New York Post, 2025). These tragedies highlight the urgent need to reexamine the relationship between humans and robots—not only from a technical standpoint but also from ethical, legal, and organizational perspectives.

This essay will explore the rise of robotics in industrial contexts, analyze the human-robot relationship, discuss the Tesla and Wisconsin cases as case studies, and evaluate the ethical and safety frameworks necessary to ensure a future where human dignity and safety are preserved.


The Rise of Robotics in Industry

Industrial robotics has become a cornerstone of global manufacturing and logistics. Robotics applications span across sectors such as automotive production, food processing, aerospace, and warehousing. According to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR, 2024), global robot installations grew by 7% in 2023, reflecting increasing reliance on automation. Companies adopt robotics for cost savings, operational efficiency, and the ability to perform repetitive or dangerous tasks that are less suitable for humans.

Yet, the accelerated adoption of robotics is not without drawbacks. Incidents such as mechanical failures, software errors, or improper human interaction expose workers to injuries that were previously less common. Moreover, small to mid-sized enterprises, which may lack robust safety infrastructures, increasingly incorporate robotic systems, amplifying risks in less regulated environments.


Human–Robot Relations: Collaboration and Tension

The field of human–robot interaction (HRI) examines how people and machines share workspaces. Traditional industrial robots are typically separated from humans by cages or barriers, while newer “collaborative robots” or cobots are designed to interact directly with workers (Dautenhahn, 2007). Cobots rely on sensors and AI-driven systems to avoid collisions, but their efficacy depends heavily on maintenance, programming accuracy, and operator training.

Trust plays a central role in human–robot relations. Research suggests that when workers trust robotic systems, productivity and safety outcomes improve (Hancock et al., 2011). However, misplaced trust—such as assuming a machine will always stop when necessary—can result in catastrophic accidents. Thus, tension arises between the promise of robotics as partners and the reality of machines as unpredictable hazards.


Case Study 1: Tesla Robotic Arm Lawsuit

The lawsuit filed by a former robotics technician against Tesla alleges that while disassembling a robotic arm, the machine unexpectedly moved, striking him, knocking him unconscious, and causing severe injuries (People, 2025). The case raises pressing questions regarding lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures, which require energy sources to be isolated before servicing equipment (OSHA, 2023). If procedures were not followed or if the robotic system lacked sufficient interlocks, accountability may fall both on the company and the machine designers.

Beyond technical failure, the Tesla case highlights the blurred line of liability in human–robot relations. Was the fault due to human error, insufficient safety protocols, or a machine malfunction? The case underscores the legal complexity of attributing responsibility when humans and robots interact in shared spaces.


Case Study 2: Wisconsin Pizza Factory Fatality

In September 2025, a worker at a Wisconsin pizza production facility was killed after being crushed by a robotic machine (New York Post, 2025). Unlike Tesla, which operates at the frontier of automation, this incident occurred in a food-processing environment—illustrating the diffusion of robotics beyond advanced manufacturing.

Smaller facilities may lack the rigorous safety oversight common in larger corporations. Reports suggest that training, maintenance, and adequate guarding were insufficient. The tragedy illustrates that as robotics adoption expands, systemic issues such as cost-cutting, inadequate regulatory enforcement, and lack of expertise increase the likelihood of fatal outcomes.


Ethical Dimensions of Human–Robot Relations

The ethical implications of robotics in industry extend beyond safety compliance. When robots harm humans, questions of moral responsibility emerge. Is it the employer, the manufacturer, or the software developer who bears ultimate responsibility? (Borenstein & Pearson, 2010).

Workers also experience psychological consequences. The fear of injury, job displacement, and dehumanization are common themes in workplaces where machines dominate. Studies indicate that poor human–robot integration can lead to stress, job dissatisfaction, and mental health risks (ÄŒaić et al., 2019). Ethical frameworks must therefore address not only physical safety but also the broader well-being of workers.


Designing Safer Human–Robot Futures

The path forward requires multi-layered strategies:

  1. Engineering Safeguards: Robots should be equipped with advanced sensing technologies, fail-safes, and emergency stop mechanisms. AI-driven predictive maintenance can reduce the chance of catastrophic failures.

  2. Procedural Safeguards: Employers must rigorously implement OSHA’s LOTO standards and other safety protocols, ensuring that servicing robots is never conducted without proper isolation.

  3. Organizational Safeguards: A robust safety culture that empowers workers to report hazards without fear of retaliation is essential. Safety training must be continuous, not a one-time exercise.

  4. Regulatory Oversight: Governments and standards organizations must strengthen oversight, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. International standards such as ISO 10218 (safety requirements for industrial robots) should be adopted widely.

  5. Ethical Innovation: Robotics designers should incorporate human-centered design principles, ensuring that machines are not only efficient but also aligned with human safety and dignity. Transparency in AI-driven robotics decision-making is crucial for trust.


Conclusion

The incidents at Tesla and in Wisconsin serve as stark reminders that the integration of robotics into industrial settings is a double-edged sword. While robots promise efficiency and safety in theory, the reality is that human workers remain vulnerable to errors, oversights, and systemic failings. The relationship between humans and robots must therefore be reframed: not as a contest between man and machine, but as a partnership requiring ethical foresight, robust safety mechanisms, and regulatory vigilance.

Ultimately, the future of robotics and human relations lies in balance. As automation reshapes industries, society must ensure that technological progress does not come at the expense of human life or dignity. By embedding safety, ethics, and accountability into every stage of robotics deployment, we can chart a path where humans and machines work not in tension, but in harmony.


References

  • Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2010). Robot caregivers: Ethical issues across the human lifespan. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 203–215.

  • ÄŒaić, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2019). Service robots: Value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. Journal of Service Management, 30(2), 147–165.

  • Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704.

  • Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527.

  • International Federation of Robotics (IFR). (2024). World Robotics Report 2024. Frankfurt: IFR.

  • OSHA. (2023). Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout). Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/

  • People. (2025). Worker Sues Tesla and Is Seeking Millions After Alleged Robot Attack. Retrieved from https://people.com/

  • New York Post. (2025). Wisconsin pizza factory worker crushed to death by robotic machine. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/

  • Robotics and Human Relations: Balancing Innovation with Safety - Hamilton By Design


Monday, September 1, 2025

Hamilton By Design

Your Trusted Mechanical Engineers in Sydney

Sydney is one of Australia’s most active industrial and commercial hubs. From manufacturing facilities in Western Sydney to infrastructure developments in the CBD and energy projects across New South Wales, the demand for skilled engineering support is higher than ever. Companies are looking for solutions that are not only technically sound but also compliant with strict Australian standards, cost-effective, and tailored to real-world challenges.

At Hamilton By Design, we are proud to deliver exactly that. As highly experienced mechanical engineers in Sydney, our team provides a complete suite of services that bridge the gap between concept and construction. Whether you need detailed drafting, structural support, 3D scanning, or turnkey project management, we work alongside you to ensure your project is delivered safely, accurately, and on time.

This article introduces our new Sydney-focused web pageMechanical Engineers in Sydney – Hamilton By Design — and explores how our services can help local businesses achieve success.





Why Mechanical Engineers in Sydney Are Essential

Sydney’s industries are diverse and complex. A single project may involve mechanical equipment, piping systems, steel structures, safety compliance, and integration with existing facilities. Without skilled mechanical engineers, these elements can easily clash, leading to costly rework, downtime, or safety risks.

Mechanical engineers in Sydney play a critical role by:

  • Designing mechanical systems and equipment tailored to local industry needs.

  • Ensuring compliance with NSW and Australian Standards.

  • Reducing downtime through careful planning and accurate as-built documentation.

  • Supporting industries in achieving sustainable, efficient operations.

  • Bridging the gap between conceptual ideas and fabrication-ready documentation.

At Hamilton By Design, we understand these challenges intimately. Our services are built around helping Sydney-based clients reduce risk, save money, and deliver successful projects.




Our Core Services in Sydney

As mechanical engineers in Sydney, Hamilton By Design provides a wide range of solutions to support industrial, commercial, and infrastructure projects.

Mechanical Engineering & Design

We specialise in the design of custom equipment and systems including chutes, hoppers, conveyors, piping layouts, and pump systems. Our engineers ensure designs are efficient, safe, and practical for long-term use. We also provide troubleshooting and optimisation services, helping clients improve existing systems that may not be performing as expected.

Structural Engineering

Many mechanical projects in Sydney require strong integration with structural systems. Our structural engineering services cover steel framework design, platforms, supports, and “like-for-like” replacements. We also provide structural modifications and audits to ensure compliance and safety.

Drafting & CAD Services

Accurate documentation is the backbone of any successful project. Our drafting and CAD services include:

  • Shop drawings and fabrication details.

  • Piping & Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs).

  • Bills of Materials (BOMs).

  • Structural detailing compliant with Australian Standards.

By combining advanced CAD expertise with local knowledge, we deliver drawings that are practical, compliant, and ready for fabrication or construction.

3D Laser & LiDAR Scanning

Sydney’s facilities and plants often need retrofits, upgrades, or expansions. In these cases, understanding the existing site is essential. Our 3D laser and LiDAR scanning services provide accurate as-built data, reducing the need for repeated site visits and avoiding costly clashes during design. The scan data can be converted into CAD models, digital twins, or used for clash detection in retrofit projects.

SolidWorks & CAD Contracting

For Sydney businesses needing extra design resources, we provide expert SolidWorks and CAD contracting support. Our team can step in on a short-term or project basis to deliver 3D models, simulations, and detailed drawings. This flexibility helps businesses scale their engineering resources without the need for permanent hires.

Project Support & Compliance

Beyond design and drafting, Hamilton By Design also supports clients with project oversight. This includes quality assurance, on-site validation, safety compliance checks, and independent reporting. By acting as a trusted partner, we help clients in Sydney avoid risks and achieve smoother project delivery.


How We Work With Sydney Clients

Our approach is built around collaboration and accuracy. When working with clients in Sydney, we start by understanding the specific challenges of the site or industry. From there, we tailor our services to deliver the best outcomes.

For example, when a client requires modifications to an existing plant in Western Sydney, we may begin with a LiDAR scan to capture accurate site data. This data is then used to produce a CAD model, which becomes the foundation for mechanical and structural design. From there, we create fabrication-ready drawings, validate them against site conditions, and support the project through to installation and compliance checks.

This streamlined process reduces rework, saves time, and ensures that every step is aligned with the client’s goals and regulatory requirements.


Why Choose Hamilton By Design?

When searching for mechanical engineers in Sydney, clients want more than just technical capability. They want a partner who understands their industry, communicates clearly, and takes ownership of results.

Here’s why Hamilton By Design stands out:

  • Local expertise – We understand Sydney’s industries, compliance frameworks, and supply chain challenges.

  • Comprehensive services – From design and drafting to scanning and compliance, we provide end-to-end support.

  • Cutting-edge tools – We use the latest CAD, SolidWorks, and LiDAR scanning technology to improve accuracy.

  • Flexibility – We can scale our involvement from small drafting packages to full project delivery.

  • Proven results – Our team has supported manufacturing, infrastructure, and industrial projects across Australia.


Industries We Support in Sydney

Our services as mechanical engineers in Sydney apply across a wide range of industries, including:

  • Manufacturing & Processing Plants – Equipment design, retrofits, and plant optimisation.

  • Construction & Infrastructure – Structural supports, mechanical integration, and compliance documentation.

  • Energy & Resources – Reliable design and maintenance support for energy and resource projects.

  • Industrial Facilities – Piping systems, structural upgrades, and fabrication-ready documentation.

By working across diverse industries, we bring broad experience and innovative solutions to every project.





Explore Our Sydney Page

To make it easier for clients to understand how we can help, we’ve created a dedicated page: Mechanical Engineers in Sydney – Hamilton By Design.

This page provides detailed information about our services, showcases the industries we work with, and highlights why Hamilton By Design is the trusted choice for Sydney businesses.


Final Thoughts

The role of mechanical engineers in Sydney is more important than ever. With industries facing increasing pressure to remain compliant, efficient, and cost-effective, expert engineering support is a must. At Hamilton By Design, we’re proud to help Sydney clients overcome challenges and deliver successful projects.

Whether you’re planning a plant retrofit, structural upgrade, or need accurate as-built documentation, our team has the tools and expertise to deliver.

👉 Explore our full offering at: Mechanical Engineers in Sydney – Hamilton By Design

And if you’d like to discuss your project, contact our team today — we’re here to help Sydney industries build with confidence.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Plant Design

Whether you’re planning to design, build or renovate a plant, you can benefit from using 3D visualization tools across your project. 3D layouts offer an organized approach, whereby multiple vendors and teams can collaborate and communicate their specific needs.

3D visuals allow vendors to visualize plant design in a way that’s not possible with 2D. This ensures that problems in the design are found early, preventing delays and expenses associated with making changes later in development.


Creating 3D visualisations of your plant layout designs promotes a visual workflow that can assist in managing external vendors, track design revisions and pinpoint areas of concern before they arise.

At Hamilton By Design, we can help to define your plant layout and put together a 3D layout that allows you to communicate clearly and effectively. With over 20+ years of experience, we are confident that we can be of value to your team, regardless of your timings, budget or industry.



Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Hamilton ByDesign - The Solidworks Experience


To our clients it is, our plan is to leverage the strength and capabilities of the Dassault Systèmes 3DExperience Platform and build a new experience that is as intuitive and easy to use as the SolidWorks tools you use today. Today, I want to share the first example of this new approach, which we are calling SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual.

SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual is a tool for conceptual mechanical design that is complementary to the products you use today. It allows you to capture ideas digitally, quickly create 3D concept models, get feedback from internal and external stakeholders, and easily manage multiple concepts before committing engineering time to build.

Why Conceptual?


  •     31% of project time is spent on conceptual mechanical design
  •     3 out of 4 engineers are engaged in conceptual mechanical design
  •     On average there are six conceptual and four design iterations in a typical project
  •     There can be more than three internal and two external stakeholder groups involved in the concept phase


Today, SolidWorks is the best solution for detail design, but it limits your creativity for this key conceptual step.  SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual fills in these gaps and allows you to:


  •     Capture ideas digitally
  •     Manage multiple concepts
  •     Collaborate and communicate


Instinctive Design

Evolving a concept is where SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual really begins to speed the design time.  Most systems force you to think about product structure in order to capture ideas. Our single modelling environment is about ease of use, creativity, and ease of change – with amazing flexibility. Capturing concepts digitally is quick and easy with familiar tools and concepts so the focus is on ideas -- not on the software.

Sketch

SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual merges the benefits of history, parametrics, and direct editing into a single interface.  As a concept evolves, you can make any change necessary to a design while respecting the design intent you previously created. The Single Modelling Environment allows you to evolve from layout sketches to 3D geometry, to separate parts and assemblies, without taking product structure into consideration.

SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual lets you evolve your design’s organizational structure as you evolve the idea and have a better understanding of where the design will go.  This eliminates wasted time because you never have to start over or drastically rework designs to make an underlying change.

Search Assemble

In our single modelling environment, as we evolve our product structure into assemblies we have familiar tools and intelligence that improves with use as components learn how they were used previously. You can also automatically apply previous intent to new designs. And SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual always saves the design, as well as various iterations, so it’s very easy to get back to a previous idea and develop it further.

As we get to more of a 3D concept, we can use motion simulation to better understand the real world interaction of parts and identify key concerns early on, before getting to detail design.


Social Innovation

When you feel that sufficient concepts have been captured, then it’s key to be able to engage stakeholders (both internal to the organization as well as with customers and vendors) to get feedback on the best path forward.

SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual has social innovation capabilities built into its foundation.  At any point, the designer can engage stakeholders by posting concepts to their private communities. Stakeholders are notified that there is a concept to review and can provide feedback using simple and familiar Web concepts.   The world is becoming more social every day, and at SolidWorks we believe in collective intelligence. SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual truly brings these capabilities to concept design.  This type of participation will allow you to better engage with your customers and differentiate yourself from the competition.  After stakeholders are done, the designer is automatically notified and can continue to evolve the concept with this feedback.

Connected

SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual is always connected to the design database and to other users.  This gives us the ability to secure your data, prevent data loss from any crashes, and automatically save iterations of each concept.

You are also connected to other users both working on your project and also in the wider SolidWorks community.  You can participate in live chats with other users to get feedback on a question or a design challenge.  Users are always working together on the same design so that there is no time wasted, or confusion as to what is the latest version.  When a team member makes a change, all users are updated in real time with the latest version so the concepts will always progress forward.

Communities

Being connected provides access anywhere at any time to your concepts.  SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual even allows users to take designs on the go for design reviews, or even for sales and marketing using mobile applications.

We are very excited about the progress we have made with SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual.  This product will be a great complement to companies using SolidWorks today.  We believe the product delivers on a new approach to conceptual design by incorporating the flexibility of a single modelling environment, social innovation, and the benefits of being connected online.

In May of this year, we will be working with select customers to validate these principles of conceptual design in their production environments.  Once we are confident in the benefits these customers are seeing we expect to make SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual available to all users in the Fall of 2013.

The team at Hamilton By Design have been using Solidworks since 2001for more information on how to get your projects moving contact HamiltonBy Design Today